Q.
A. Samsung Galaxy W Review: http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_w_i8150-review-689.php
Nokia 701 vs Samsung galaxy w i8150 vs Samsung galaxy ace plus s7500?
Q. Nokia 701 vs Samsung galaxy w i8150 vs Samsung galaxy ace plus s7500 according to specifications...... specially battery life , audio quality , loud music , shooting images and videos , image and video resolutions , phone errors and problems that facing users... and also the rest of specifications .... it would be better if it's users opinions that based on facts and experience of using and reading users review rather than site compares..... Thanks in advance.
A. All I know is that Nokia is loosing battles in the high-end market to apple, HTC and Samsung. The best androids are
#4 Galaxy II
#3 HTC
#2 Galaxy III
#1 Galaxy Note (it's quite big, doesn't fit in a pocket that is small in any way)
I'm buying Galaxy Y this time, so this one also will not get stolen.
Nokia is good if you want to kill someone, rob a bank or deflect a bullet :)
Which is better, Samsung Galaxy Ace 2 or Samsung Galaxy W I8150?
Q. I compared them on GSMarena.com, and everything was pretty much the same except for:
Internal Memory: Ace2: 4GB W: 1.7 GB storage, 2 GB ROM
RAM: Ace2: 768MB W: 512MB
CPU: Ace2: dual-core 800MHz W: 1.4 GHz Scorpion
GPU: Ace2: Mali-400MP W: Adreno 205
That's all, everything else is the same, so which one do u think is better?
A. The Galaxy Ace 2 is better. Even the specs you've listed shows how much better than Galaxy Ace 2 is. Galaxy Ace 2 is more supported by Samsung and will get the Android 4.0 update which makes it even better compared to the Galaxy W which won't even be getting this update and will be stuck on Android 2.3. Galaxy Ace 2 has close to iPhone 4S specs (especially the CPU).
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Title : Galaxy W is it good ?
Description : Q. A. Samsung Galaxy W Review: http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_w_i8150-review-689.php Original Question Nokia 701 vs Samsung galaxy...